email

Cargo.lock

@@ -7961,6 +7961,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "async-trait",
  "crossterm",
  "derivative",
+ "email_address",
  "iban_validate",
  "jiff",
  "once_cell",

todo.md

@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+# TUI Pages TODO
+
+## Give form editors a dedicated page-level focus target
+
+### Current change
+
+Dynamic form-field visibility belongs to `tui-canvas`. A `FormEditor` knows its
+stable logical field indexes and decides which fields are currently visible and
+navigable through `DataProvider::field_visibility`.
+
+The phone-number example previously duplicated that state in `tui-pages`:
+
+```rust
+PageFocusBuilder::new()
+    .canvas_field_indices(state.editor.navigable_fields())
+```
+
+This rebuilt a second per-field list every time the page specification was
+refreshed. When the phone extension appeared or disappeared, the page focus
+targets changed. `TuiPages::sync_focus_to_spec` consequently called
+`FocusManager::register_page`, which resets page-level focus state. Besides the
+repeated visibility scan and allocation, this reconciliation caused observable
+input lag and made focus behavior depend on two independently maintained lists.
+
+The immediate fix replaces that dynamic list with one stable page-level target:
+
+```rust
+PageFocusBuilder::new().canvas_form_editor()
+```
+
+Internal field navigation and visibility are now handled only by `tui-canvas`.
+`tui-pages` only needs to know whether focus is inside the form or outside it.
+
+### Concern with the immediate API
+
+`canvas_form_editor()` currently represents the complete form using
+`FocusTarget::CanvasField(0)`. The zero is a marker, not the editor's current
+field. This is correct for the current example because it contains one form
+editor and the form-editor key hook only checks `FocusTarget::is_canvas()`.
+
+However, overloading `CanvasField(0)` is ambiguous and should not become the
+finished public design:
+
+- Two form editors on the same page cannot be identified independently.
+- A form editor and a standalone Canvas widget using field index `0` have the
+  same page-level identity.
+- Every form-editor hook currently accepts any Canvas focus target, so multiple
+  registered form-editor hooks could compete for the same key event.
+- Application code inspecting `FocusTarget::CanvasField(index)` may reasonably
+  assume that `index` is a real field index. For a form editor it is now only a
+  sentinel.
+- Directly setting page focus cannot express which form editor should receive
+  focus.
+- Future focus restoration cannot reliably distinguish multiple editors.
+
+### Recommended design
+
+Add a dedicated focus-target variant carrying the form-editor ID:
+
+```rust
+pub enum FocusTarget<O = ()> {
+    CanvasFormEditor(usize),
+    CanvasField(usize),
+    InternalCanvasField(usize),
+    // ...
+}
+```
+
+Change the builder API to require the same ID used when registering the Canvas
+hook:
+
+```rust
+PageFocusBuilder::new().canvas_form_editor(0)
+```
+
+The responsibilities would then be explicit:
+
+- `CanvasFormEditor(id)` identifies one complete form at the page level.
+- `CanvasField(index)` remains for independently focusable Canvas widgets.
+- `InternalCanvasField(index)` retains its existing internal/non-top-level
+  meaning where it is still needed.
+- `FormEditor` remains the sole owner of its current field, internal navigation,
+  hidden fields, and computed/non-navigable fields.
+- `tui-pages` owns navigation between the form and other page components such
+  as buttons, sections, and other form editors.
+
+The form-editor key hook must match its registered editor ID instead of merely
+checking `FocusTarget::is_canvas()`:
+
+```rust
+matches!(
+    ctx.focus.as_ref(),
+    Some(FocusTarget::CanvasFormEditor(focused_id)) if focused_id == id
+)
+```
+
+Cursor behavior and input-layer selection should use the same ID-aware check.
+`FocusTarget::is_canvas()` should include the new variant so generic canvas
+boundary behavior continues to work.
+
+### Migration work
+
+1. Add `FocusTarget::CanvasFormEditor(usize)`.
+2. Change `PageFocusBuilder::canvas_form_editor()` to
+   `canvas_form_editor(editor_id)`.
+3. Update form-editor key dispatch, paste dispatch, cursor behavior, and input
+   context selection to require the matching editor ID.
+4. Keep standalone text inputs and text areas matched through their existing
+   `CanvasField(index)` identities.
+5. Update examples to pass the same ID to the page focus builder and
+   `TuiPagesBuilder::canvas_form_editor(id)`.
+6. Search applications for per-field form focus lists and replace those lists
+   with one `CanvasFormEditor(id)` target at the correct position among the
+   other page targets.
+
+Do not retain `CanvasField(0)` as a compatibility sentinel unless backwards
+compatibility is explicitly requested.
+
+### Required tests
+
+- One form editor keeps the same page focus target while internal field
+  visibility changes.
+- Showing and hiding a dependent field does not call page focus registration or
+  reset the current page-level target.
+- A page containing two form editors routes keys only to the focused editor ID.
+- A form editor and standalone Canvas text input can coexist without identity
+  collisions.
+- Exiting the first or last navigable form field moves to the correct adjacent
+  page component.
+- Returning focus to a form preserves or deliberately restores the editor's
+  internal current field according to the chosen policy.
+- Paste and cursor-style routing use the same editor-ID matching as key input.
+
+### Performance acceptance criteria
+
+- Page refresh must not enumerate a form editor's visible or navigable fields.
+- Changing internal field visibility must not change the page-level focus
+  target vector.
+- `sync_focus_to_spec` must not call `register_page` merely because a form row
+  appeared or disappeared.
+- Typing into a visibility-controlling field must not allocate a second list of
+  form-field focus targets in `tui-pages`.